Shared Services Business Process Outsourcing Association Logo
tagline
Skip to navigationSkip navigation

Shared Services, UK, Government, Efficiency

UK Government's shared services plan faces challenges

  • |
  • Print |
15 Jun 2006 | (Thinking Point)
Channel Sponsorship

The UK Cabinet Office started tendering for an IT services provider last week. Initially, the new deal will simply replace an existing contract that is about to expire, but in the longer term it is hoped the service will be made available to other organizations.

The department is the latest in a growing list of public sector organizations embarking on such projects to develop centralized administrative functions.

Shared services is the latest holy grail of Whitehall reform, viewed by its exponents as the route to joined-up government and the end of the silo culture. It is central to the Efficiency Review, the Transformational Government (TG) plan and the departmental budget round.

It also has the endorsement of the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit (PMDU), the Treasury and Cabinet Secretary Gus O’Donnell.

The government estimates potential annual savings of 20 per cent, or £1.4bn, through sharing human resources (HR) and finance across the public sector. But it is not just the money.

‘There are big numbers in terms of efficiency gains, but there is an even bigger impact in terms of the effect of improved, higher-quality internal processes,’ said Ian Watmore, head of the PMDU.

There are no easy wins, but local government will likely be the most difficult area because the complexities multiply when one authority has to give up responsibility and instead receive a service from another.

Senior political backing and the TG strategy’s formal link to departmental budget setting will do much to enforce an agenda with no explicit mandate. That 10 permanent secretaries are committed to the Whitehall2 plan is, rightly, considered a major step forward. But the real battle has barely begun.

The changes to working practice will be significant. And the impact on staff numbers is unlikely to go uncontested. The Efficiency Review has already faced trade union criticism over redundancies, and shared services is the review’s successor.

The predicted 20 per cent cost savings include staff reductions of similar proportion. And while the aim is for staff to be re-deployed to frontline services, reality is rarely so neat.

With these issues the political impetus of the agenda will be truly tested.

‘If this is going to work it will be a considerable re-organization and that will be painful,’ said Eric Woods, government practice director at analyst Ovum.

‘It will be crucial to get some early successes because if shared services is shown to be too painful the political will dissolve,’ he said.

Source: www.vnunet.com

  • |
  • Print |
Related Content:
Can BPO provide more cost reduction, risk management, and quality improvement? When? Obtain a neutral perspective, clear evaluation criteria, and concrete examples.29 Jul 2008 | (Case Study)

Shared Services Versus BPOWhat Business leaders need to know when deciding about Internal or Outsourced Models29 Jul 2008 | (Thinking Point)

Capgemini to Acquire and Manage Unilever Financial Shared Services in Latin AmericaCapgemini announces that it has signed an agreement with Unilever to acquire and manage its financial shared service centers in Santiago, Chile, and Sao Paulo, Brazil.09 Apr 2008 | (News)

Shared Services and Outsourcing — Evolution Into a Hybrid ModelAs organizations are increasingly combining internal shared services and outsourcing models into a flexible, new “hybrid”, TPI examines the steps leading to the development of this hybrid and discusses...08 Apr 2008 | (Thinking Point)

Extracting Full Value From Your Shared Services OrganisationSince the early 1990s, shared services have been seen as a key vehicle for transforming back office support activities, however many shared services organizations are failing to meet their full potential....08 Apr 2008 | (Thinking Point)

Login